logo

My Handcrafted Opinions on Whiskies, Distilleries and Other Related Stuff

Most Recent Whisky

Most Recent Whisky Review

Dalmore Regalis

The nose has vanilla, spices and cherrywood (or at least what I imagine cherry wood would smell like which is basically cherries and wood).  The taste is nutty, with tobacco, raspberry, caramel and milk chocolate.  The finish is woody, spicy with some cigar smoke.  With water it gets sweeter with ripe banana, more caramel and more tobacco in finish.  Overall a very nice, 40% ABV, sherry finished travel retail expression from Dalmore.

Read More
  • Sunday, 18 March 2012 20:46

    The Lack of the Irish? The Six Events that Nearly Wiped Out Irish Distilling

    Written by

    It is St Patrick's Day weekend so an Irish blog entry is required and it turns out that I have quite a lot of Irish ancestry.  I knew my mother's family, Bradley, came to England from Cork in the early 20th century.    What I didn't know until I did some family research in 2011 was that my father's family also came from Ireland.  The Seaton's (originally spelled Seton) moved from Aberdeenshire, Scotland to County Tyrone, Ireland in the late 1600's and my great great grandfather James came over to Staffordshire in England in the late 1840's, added the "a" to Seton and we became Seaton.

     

    That connection got me thinking about Irish whiskey and the run of bad luck that nearly wiped out the Irish distilling industry.  I think it can be summed up in six different events in relatively short time period, approximately 100 years that hurt the Irish whiskey industry and more often than not benefited the Scots, and changed the industry forever.

    Number one was the invention of the Coffey continuous still in 1832 and the ability to make the lower cost grain whiskies.  Up until then both Scotland and Ireland made whisky in pot stills.  The Irish clung to the tradition of pot still distilled whiskey and disputed if the product of the continuous still was even whiskey.  The Scots embraced the Coffey still  (though not while it was running – ouch) and eventually won the argument "what is whisky?"  The irony is that this critical component in the eventual downfall of the Irish industry, the Coffey still, was in fact invented by an Irishman.

    The 1850s saw invention of blending of whisky, commonly credited to Andrew Usher, a Scot, who began mixing the pot still single malts and continuous still grain whiskies to produce a lighter, consistent and more accessible spirit.  When the Phylloxora beetle affected French vines and wine and brandy production reduced significantly in the late 1880's it created a new market for whisky that the new lower cost, consistent and more approachable Scottish blends subsequently exploited and filled. Without Scottish blends perhaps the Irish pot still whiskies would have filled that void and been the replacement for brandy?

    Number three was the introduction of prohibition in the USA in 1920.  The USA was huge natural market for Irish whiskey with so many Irish people transplanted to the new world after the hardships of the 1700 and 1800s and Irish was the most common imported whisky in the USA before prohibition.  It is also important to note, and often forgotten,  that the Temperence movement that led to prohibition in the USA was also strong in the UK and Ireland which in turn also reduced demand in those home markets and led to legislation including limiting the sales of alcohol, increasing costs of production and restricting pub opening hours.   The Irish whiskies had more to lose than the Scots from the Temperance movement in the 1920s, and if Prohibition had not happened then I think it is likely Irish would have remained the imported whiskey of choice in the USA.

    Number four was the winning of Irish independence in 1922.  The problem was this victory came with a loss of access to British Empire markets post independence, again a gap the Scots were well positioned to fill.  As the debate around Scottish independence and the value of a United Kingdom is again in the news, this raises the question if Scotland had been independent and had no access to English, Empire and Commonwealth markets would the thriving Scotch industry be the same today or would we have had an English or Welsh whisky industry fill this demand or would the Irish, competing on a level footing, been more successful?   Was being part of the UK the best thing that could have happened for the Scotch whisky industry?

    Number five was the great depression that began in 1929.  After all the restrictions on sales due to temperance, the loss of access to British and Commonwealth markets the last thing the Irish whiskey industry needed was a global depression to further depress sales.   Unfortunately that is exactly what happened.

    The final blow, number six, was the outbreak of World War II in 1939.  Wartime is very disruptive to trade when you are an island and have to ship your merchandise over U-boat and mine infested oceans.  In addition, prior to the invasion of Europe in 1944, many of the US troops were based in the UK (Ireland chose to remain neutral) and the whisky of choice in the UK, for all the reasons above, was Scotch.  So the returning GI's at the end of the war had acquired a taste for Scotch further solidifying the US market in favor of the Scots.

    So much for the luck of the Irish when it comes to whiskey.  It is a tremendous achievement and testament to the product that it even still exists, and I for one am really glad it does, maybe that's in part due to my Irish genes.

    Leave a comment

    Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.

    Whiskies Tried...

    Total to Date: 637

    Distilleries

    Visited to Date: 58

    Follow Me on Twitter!

    Random Whisky

    Lysholm Linie Aquavit

    My justification for inclusion of a Norwegian aquavit, not that I need one, is that all whisky is technically aquavit...as in the "the water of life".  In fact the first reference to whisky in Scotland was in fact a reference to Aqua Vitae.  Think of today's whiskies as a product of evolution and Norway's aquavit as the isolated shrew that cut off from rest of world that evolved into a unique species of it's own.  On a recent trip to Norway (one of the increasingly few countries that doesn't produce it's own whisky) I discovered an interesting story about this particular brand of their national drink aquavit that I shall now tell.  Are you sitting comfortably?  Then I will begin. The story goes that a home sick Norwegian in Australia ordered a large consignmment of aquavit to be shipped to him.  The aquavit was loaded into sherry casks and shipped from the northern hemisphere, across the equator (or linie in Norwegian)  to Australia.  Unfortunately by the time it arrived the consignee had passed away and the captain had no other buyers for aquavit in Australia and turned around and took it back to Norway, crossing the linie one more time.  Now when they opened the casks back in the Norway they found the aquavit was the best anyone had ever tried.  This was attributed to the long time spent in sherry casks (it takes a long time to sail to Australia and back), change in climate, cold to warm to cold again and the the gentle rocking to ensure lots of wood to spirit contact.  So now this Linie product is still matured in the same way, loaded into sherry casks and shipped to Australia and back in ships before bottling and guaranteed to have crossed the linie twice.  In fact each bottle includes the details of the vessel and voyage the contents took.  Very cool, as cool as a Norwegian winter's day you might say if you were in search of a easy metaphor.   This sample was bottled at 41.5% ABV.  The nose is very fresh and light; herbal and minty with no sign of any sherry influence.  Rather delicious.  The taste starts with more mint and herbs, fresh grassy and even something like onion (not as bad as it sounds... caramalized onion maybe) and with time a little sweetness like caramel and milk chocolate (perhaps the sherry cask influence).  None of the harshness I was expecting.  The finish has more mint and lingers like toothpaste in the morning and some fruit and caramel notes can be detected.  Overall lacks the complexity or depth of a typical single malt, a bit one dimensional, and the role of sherry casks seems to be to round off rough edges rather than impart flavor (probably lots of refilling going on?) but still interesting and a nice change.