My Handcrafted Opinions on Whiskies, Distilleries and Other Related Stuff
The nose on 43.4% expression is very floral with some wheaty breakfast biscuits and spicy notes. The taste is very smooth with baked spiced apples (maybe even slightly burnt) caramel and honey. The finish has some slow building heat along with some Bovril (salty / meaty) notes. Reminded me of good Texas barbeque brisket with strong spice bark. Overall a ittle too much burnt, salty and bitter notes with not enough sweetness to balance it for me.
Read More
Location: Zatta Bar, Hilton Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Date: July 2016
Price: Ummm.... forgot to check
Recipe: Glenlivet 12 year old, Vermouth, Angostura Bitters
Garnish: Maraschino cherry
Served: Up
Comments: When is a Manhattan not a Manhattan? When it is a Rob Roy ie made with Scotch... oh well
What is this about? Check out http://www.somanywhiskies.com/item/749-the-manhattan-project-ii
Location: Hilton Americas Lobby Bar, Houston, Texas
Date: June 2016
Price: $ 15 ($20.40 SGD)
Recipe: Bulliet Rye based
Garnish: Black Cherry
Served: Rocks
Comments: Nice rye forward and not too sweet. Also gave me choice of bourbon or rye...
What is this about? Check out http://www.somanywhiskies.com/item/749-the-manhattan-project-ii
Location: Emirates Lounge, Changi Airport, Singapore
Date: June 2016
Price: Free (self made)
Recipe: Jim Beam, Martini Rossi, Angostura Bitters
Garnish: None
Served: Rocks
Comments: Noticed all ingredients available at the bar... so made a simple / classic Manhattan for myself.
What is this about? Check out http://www.somanywhiskies.com/item/749-the-manhattan-project-ii
Location: Ciel de Paris, Montparnasse, Paris
Date: May 2016
Price: 18 Euros ($27.71 SGD)
Recipe: Simply Four Roses Bourbon and Martini Rossi.... (nearly $28!)
Garnish: None
Served: Up
Comments: Amazing view from 56th floor restaurant but I paid for it with a below average Manhattan
What is this about? Check out http://www.somanywhiskies.com/item/749-the-manhattan-project-ii
Location: Homemade, Singapore
Date: May 2016
Price: N/A
Recipe: Bulleit Rye, Dolin, Luxardo Maraschino, Angostura Bitters
Garnish: None
Served: Up
Comments: Recreated Reserve 101 "classic" recipe with Bulleit rye, great balance.
What is this about? Check out http://www.somanywhiskies.com/item/749-the-manhattan-project-ii
Location: Lawry's Prime Rib, Singapore
Date: May 2016
Price: $ 15 SGD ($10.92 USD)
Recipe: Canadian Club, Sweet and Dry Vermouth (no bitters?)
Garnish: Orange peel
Served: Up
Comments: Good value (for Singapore) and my first "perfect Manhattan" experiment
What is this about? Check out http://www.somanywhiskies.com/item/749-the-manhattan-project-ii
Location: Reserve 101, Houston, Texas
Date: April 2016
Price: $ 8 USD
Recipe: Dolin Vermouth, Bulleit Bourbon, Maraschino Liqueur, Angostura Bitters
Garnish: Cherry
Served: Rocks
Comments: One of my favorites (love the maraschino) and great value. Must try with rye....
What is this about? Check out http://www.somanywhiskies.com/item/749-the-manhattan-project-ii
Location: Oak Room, Fairmont Palliser, Calgary, Canada
Date: April 2016
Price: $ 18 CAD ($14.19 USD)
Recipe: Carprano Antica Vermouth, Knob Creek, Angostura Bitters
Garnish: Black cherry
Served: Up
Comments: Nice and sweet with Bourbon but still balanced due to heavy dash of bitters.
What is this about? Check out http://www.somanywhiskies.com/item/749-the-manhattan-project-ii
Location: Hard Rock Hotel, Sentosa, Singapore
Date: April 2016
Price: $ 21 SGD ($15.50 USD)
Recipe: No recipe
Garnish: Maraschino cherry
Served: Up
Comments: Dry, not too sweet and a little on the small side.
What is this about? Check out http://www.somanywhiskies.com/item/749-the-manhattan-project-ii
Location: Homemade, Singapore
Date: April 2016
Price: Free
Recipe: 2 parts Maker's Mark, 1 part Luxardo Maraschino Liqueur, 1 part Antica Sweet Vermouth, dash bitters
Garnish: With the maraschino liqueur in recipe no need for cherry
Served: Up
Comments: I totally stole this recipe from Reserve 101 and it now my "go to" homemade recipe. A little sweet, need to try with rye.
What is this about? Check out http://www.somanywhiskies.com/item/749-the-manhattan-project-ii
My increasingly rare blog postings have evolved more recently into me trying to consolidate my various responses, postings and comments from the various online whisky forums that I frequent into a single (hopefully coherent) position on the burning whisky issue of the day. I have noticed in these forums that I often find myself out of step with the online (generally very nice) whisky online community. Recent examples of this include the uproar over Makers Mark ABV reduction and the furor over Balcones owner’s decision to remove Chip Tate from the company.
(Side note: can anyone tell me if the #nochipnobalcones thing is still applicable because there is no Chip?)
I am clearly a contrarian, I freely admit that and I have always shied away from the herd at every opportunity. I like to seek the other point of view and I don’t accept very much at face value (except perhaps cash). So perhaps I should embrace this as my role in in the #whiskyfabric?
My thoughts these days have turned to the waning Compass Box campaign to “increase transparency” and their online petition to change the SWA / EU regulations that govern such things. The immediate reaction from the online community to the news that one of the recent Compass Box whisky releases fell foul of EU laws was so strong and full of the righteous indignation that only whisky bloggers can generate that my contrarian response kicked in like the Millennium Falcon’s hyper drive and I posted several questions and comments on various online sites that as yet, I feel, have been largely unanswered. Perhaps you would like to try?
Firstly anyone who can tell me that this was an issue they cared about before this one, and to my knowledge only, highly publicized recent example, please feel free to send me any blog posting or magazine articles that clamored for more transparency and EU law changes. They will be gratefully received and I will publish on this website along with a full apology with links to the aforementioned blog posts. That some people are furious about an issue they didn’t care about three months is slightly ridiculous to me. If it didn’t matter then why does it matter so much now?
Which brings me to my next question; am I the only the only one who is slightly cynical about the Compass Box motive for leading this campaign? They are painting themselves as the industry outsider, fighting against “the man” (as someone much more eloquent than me put it on one forum), helping the consumers who are being denied information they desperately need by faceless government drones and setting up a petition all of which just so happens to deliver a fantastic marketing and brand coup to Compass Box and drive lots of extra web traffic to a Compass Box website. The really cynical would even suggest, with hindsight, it would have served Compass Box well to be the “mystery industry insider” who informed the SWA in the first place and generated all this lovely (and free) publicity. Stranger things have happened in Marketing and as I recall John Glaser came from Diageo Marketing rather than distilling or blending? To be clear I don’t think this is what happened, but you have to admit it would have been a stroke of utter genius if it had. At the very least they have spun it brilliantly and made lemons from lemonade (just please don’t make any more Orangerie).
Finally I have challenged everyone to step back, and think about this from the average whisky consumer perspective, rather than the very narrow perspective of the whisky blogger. Of course the blogger wants to know the exact make up of his bottle and can differentiate the difference between a blend containing some 40 year old whisky and a 40 year old blended whisky. But can the “man in the street”?
Perhaps I am being patronizing and harsh and making unfair assumptions about the average consumer. I admit that thought occurred to me, but then I looked at the current US primary election and that thought stopped occurring. To the whisky savvy (as anyone reading this incredible obscure blog is bound to be) I would I contend your demand for transparency opens door to abuse, confusion and resentment. All the reasons the current legislation were put in place as certain people chose to emphasize the age of some of the whiskeys in their blends. As I have said before, one man’s “transparency” is another man’s “confusing jargon” and I am not convinced that “full disclosure” is the real answer and is really a better solution than what we have now. No system is going to be perfect and as I stated earlier pretty much no –one seemed to have much of a problem with current system until one whisky came along….